Love Bees Honey 10/26/25 Love Bees Honey 10/26/25

Doreen Saunders

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did She Cause?
What Laws Did/Does She Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about Danielle Saunders:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:

What Offense(s) Did She Cause?

Evidence obtained through Whitepages.com and verified by the New Jersey Administrative Office of Courtsconfirms that Doreen S. Saunders has a criminal history involving Theft by Deception in Mercer County, New Jersey. The offense, charged on March 17, 1989, reflects a pattern of fraudulent behavior and deceptive intent consistent with later manipulative acts witnessed through her daughter, Danielle Saunders, and their extended network.

Additional records from Smyrna, Georgia (Case No. 14-J-07666) show a civil judgment totaling $1,541.14, further establishing her financial and ethical misconduct across multiple states. These offenses, though occurring decades apart, collectively demonstrate a continued pattern of financial deceit, boundary exploitation, and false self-representation— elements central to the broader abuse campaign directed toward Chalise Mapp.

What Laws Did/Does She Break?

Theft by Deception (N.J.S.A. 2C:20-4) — Charged March 17, 1989
Case Numbers: 89001666; MER89001666SAUDOR; 19630912
Jurisdiction: Mercer County, New Jersey
Offense Type: Felony
Disposition: Guilty
Probation: 5 years (recorded as “05y-00m”)
Offense Details: Knowingly obtained property or benefit through purposeful deception, misrepresentation, or false pretense.
Civil Judgment (Georgia Case 14-J-07666) — Smyrna, GA
Judgment Amount: $1,541.14
Offense Type: Financial liability; sustained pattern of deceptive or negligent behavior.

These official records establish a multi-jurisdictional pattern of dishonesty — aligning with subsequent acts of deception involving false familial claims, property mimicry, and her daughter’s later participation in defamation, identity interference, and guardianship-related misconduct.

What Offenses/Crimes Continue?

While the original conviction dates back to 1989, the psychological and behavioral continuity remains apparent. Doreen’s historical misuse of trust and proximity laid the foundation for continued deceptive social manipulation, identity mirroring, and emotional exploitation through her daughter, Danielle. These actions indirectly facilitated the spread of disinformation, impersonation, and social engineering against Chalise Mapp.

Backstory

School Connection: Chalise Monique Mapp met Danielle Saunders (Doreen’s daughter) while attending P.J. Hill Elementary School. Danielle immediately exhibited clingy, over-affectionate behavior toward Chalise after a single act of kindness.
Early Friendship: The girls briefly became friends and exchanged home visits. Chalise’s home at 144 Cuyler Avenue, Trenton, NJ, was a well-kept single-family residence with a yard, porch, and side yard. It was shared by three adults and two children but maintained a warm and stable environment.
Danielle’s Residence: In stark contrast, Danielle’s home—an apartment under Doreen Saunders’s care—was located at or near 2 North Walter Avenue / 1150 East State Street Apt. 2, Trenton, NJ 08609. The building was run-down and heavily roach-infested, a condition visible even from external Google Maps imagery and supported by witness memory and site condition reports (see attached photo exhibits and PDFs: [22†1150 E State St #2 – Google Maps], [23†144 Cuyler Ave – Google Maps], and [36†130 S Walter Ave – Google Maps]).
Parental Intervention: Chalise’s mother prohibited further visits to Danielle’s home for safety and hygiene reasons. Nonetheless, she continued to show compassion by welcoming Danielle into their home for meals, television, playtime, ballet classes, and family outings to Pizza Hut and Sportsland.
Boundary Erosion: Danielle began referring to Chalise’s relatives as her own—calling Chalise’s grandmother “Grandma.” Despite discomfort, Chalise was pressured by Danielle’s guilt tactics to accept this behavior.
Doreen’s Role: Doreen Saunders herself began referring to Chalise as her “daughter,” further overstepping familial boundaries. Chalise emphasizes that she never reciprocated this title during her youth and only briefly used it as an adult, after her biological mother’s passing, out of social courtesy rather than emotional attachment.
Suspicious Relocation: After Danielle began benefiting from the hospitality of Chalise’s mother and grandmother, Doreen moved her family to a location one street behind Chalise’s home—a subtle but deliberate shift suggesting an attempt to mirror or shadow Chalise’s household. The new address, 130 S. Walter Avenue, Trenton, NJ, sits within immediate walking distance of 144 Cuyler Avenue, as confirmed by Google Maps ([36†130 S Walter Ave – Google Maps]).
Visual Similarity and Proximity: The 130 S. Walter Avenue property, while less maintained, resembled the layout and facade of Chalise’s 144 Cuyler Avenue home, signaling an intentional effort to duplicate the visual and structural appearance of Chalise’s environment. Doreen’s relocation pattern reflects a continued psychological mirroring—using geographic and aesthetic imitation as a subtle method of identity infringement and social competition.

Educational & Geographic Context

Between 2006 and 2008, Chalise Mapp lived between New Jersey and New York while attending the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT) in Manhattan. Evidence includes:

FIT Acceptance Letter dated January 4, 2007, addressed to 107-43 Watson Place, Jamaica, NY, confirming admission into Fashion Merchandising Management (AAS Program).
TransUnion Credit Report (November 2007) listing both 144 Cuyler Avenue (NJ) and 107-43 Watson Place (NY) as active addresses.
Unopened Commerce Bank envelope postmarked January 2008 and sent to Jamaica, NY, validating ongoing financial correspondence in New York.

During this time, Chalise openly discussed her goal of living permanently in New York City. Both Danielle and Doreen Saunders were aware of these plans. Shortly afterward, they relocated to Atlanta, Georgia — a region commonly marketed as a “Black Hollywood” or creative hub similar to NYC. While Chalise viewed her goals and progress with pride, their move reflected competitive imitation rather than inspiration.

Instead of pursuing their own path, Doreen and Danielle mirrored Chalise’s ambitions, then used them as ammunition for jealousy-driven sabotage — spreading false rumors, interfering with her relationships, and attempting to socially and romantically undercut her. These actions furthered the pattern of copycat behavior, envy-driven rivalry, and malicious interference that had begun in Trenton and followed Chalise across states.

Details about Doreen Saunders

Full Name: Doreen S. Saunders
Date of Birth: September 12, 1963
Known Addresses:
- Current: 1725 Sterling Trail SW, Marietta, GA 30008 (Whitepages record, 2015–present; purchased for ~$195K).
- Former: 306 Sandalwood Dr, Atlanta, GA (2008–2018); 1322 Old Roswell Rd, Roswell, GA (2007–2019); 1901 Old Concord Rd SE Apt B2, Smyrna, GA (2013–2015); 19 Burning Tree Ln, Lawrence Township, NJ (1999); 130 S. Walter Ave, Trenton, NJ (1991–2003); 1150 E. State St Apt 2–3, Trenton, NJ (1989–1998).
Connections: Mother of Danielle Saunders. Former employee at ETS (Educational Testing Service). Later held administrative positions similar to those of Chalise Mapp and her late mother, suggesting a repeated pattern of occupational mimicry.

Timeline of Events

1989: Charged with Theft by Deception (Mercer County, NJ; Case MER89001666SAUDOR).
Early 1990s: Friendship between Chalise and Danielle begins at P.J. Hill Elementary.
Mid-1990s: Doreen relocates her household to 130 S. Walter Avenue, directly behind 144 Cuyler Avenue.
Late 1990s: Moves to Lawrence Township (Burning Tree Ln).
2006–2008: Chalise lives between Trenton, NJ and New York City for school; Doreen and Danielle later move to Georgia soon after learning of her NYC plans.
2007–2019: Establishes residence in Roswell and Atlanta, GA.
2015–Present: Moves to Marietta, GA.
Ongoing: Continued digital presence through Facebook (@psalmist.saunders) and known contact email (dsaunders@ets.org).

Evidence Collected

Whitepages.com record (Oct 2025) confirming NJ Theft by Deception case and GA civil judgment.
NJ Administrative Office of Courts citation: Case MER89001666SAUDOR.
Georgia court record (Smyrna): Case 14-J-07666, Judgment $1,541.14.
FIT Acceptance Letter (2007) and TransUnion Credit Report (2007).
Unopened Commerce Bank envelope (2008) addressed to Jamaica, NY.
Google Maps PDFs of 1150 E State St #2, 130 S Walter Ave, and 144 Cuyler Ave.
Facebook evidence: posts referencing biblical allusions and photos (gun range, lifestyle mimicry) consistent with behavioral mirroring of Chalise’s content and style.

Witnesses / Third-Party Involvement

Chalise Mapp’s mother (witness to early household contrasts).
Former neighbors and ETS colleagues aware of Doreen’s behavioral mimicry and property relocations.
Individuals familiar with Danielle’s ongoing copycat conduct and relationship interference.

Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp)

The verified conviction for Theft by Deception establishes a clear precedent for Doreen Saunders’ long-standing pattern of deceit. Her later attempts to imitate Chalise’s home, employment, creative pursuits, and even relocation plans expanded the psychological harm initiated during childhood. This repeated behavior reinforced an ongoing cycle of exploitation that transcended state lines and evolved into organized social and reputational sabotage.Offense(s) Committed

Danielle Saunders engaged in an extended pattern of harassment, fraud, and endangerment against Chalise Monique Mapp, marked by deceit, manipulation of institutions, and deliberate exposure to risk.
Her confirmed and alleged acts include:

Criminal Harassment & Stalking: Years of unwanted contact, triangulation through third parties, and coordinated online defamation.
Identity Theft & False Representation: Facilitating fraudulent guardianship, marriage, and insurance filings in Chalise’s name.
Cyber Harassment & Defamation: False public claims meant to damage Chalise’s reputation, character, and employment.
Employment Sabotage: Contacting Princeton University and other entities to interfere with Chalise’s career.
Medical Manipulation / Institutional Retaliation: Using her former professional ties at Capital Health (Hopewell, NJ) to influence Chalise’s July 2025 false detainment and psychiatric misdiagnosis.
Sexual Misconduct & Endangerment: Maintaining an affair with David Webb during his relationship with Chalise, later infecting him with a permanent, incurable disease; subsequently targeting other ex-partners of Chalise to replicate harm.
Conspiracy & Collusion: Working with Marketta Mapp, Mark Mapp, David Webb, and others to extend harassment and misinformation.
Psychological & Emotional Abuse: Long-term gaslighting, imitation, and coercion intended to erase Chalise’s identity and autonomy.

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

The following material is presented for educational, journalistic, and evidentiary purposes only. All names, email addresses, and communications shown appear solely to verify incidents of identity theft, fraud, and related misconduct. This publication does not encourage contact, harassment, or retaliation toward any person named.
Information is reproduced from existing records, emails, and correspondence that form part of ongoing documentation submitted to legal and investigative authorities. Statements are based on verifiable evidence and are made in good-faith reporting to protect the public and defend my livelihood. Personal addresses, phone numbers, or unrelated private details have been redacted where possible to preserve privacy.

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 10/11/25 Love Bees Honey 10/11/25

Trenton Courts

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did They Cause?
What Laws Did/Does They Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about activities within the Trenton Courts:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:

What Offense(s) Did They Cause?

Procedural irregularities and confusion over case posture (trial vs. pretrial), culminating in a mandatory diversion to mediation even when the complainant objected.
Mishandling of a conditional dismissal’s key terms (especially “no contact” for one year) and failure to give effect to alleged violations during the active dismissal period.
Administrative stonewalling—directing the victim to “file a new complaint” instead of honoring the court’s on-record remedy (return to trial upon violation) and refusing to reopen despite contemporaneous evidence of violations.
Victim-unfriendly case messaging that minimized safety concerns and shifted burden back to the complainant instead of enforcing the judge’s conditions.

What Laws Did/Does They Break?

The record you provided indicates potential departures from court policy and due-process-adjacent safeguards, chiefly:
- Conditional dismissal enforcement: When a condition (“no contact for one year”) is allegedly violated within the active period, the matter is supposed to return for adjudication—not be dismissed as “disposed” with instructions to start over.
- Contempt / order-violation exposure: Your letter cites N.J.S.A. 2C:29-9 (contempt) and N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4 (harassment) as the underlying legal hooks for violations via third-party contact.
To be precise: the files support administrative mishandling and non-enforcement; whether that rises to a statutory violation by court actors would be a question for oversight bodies. (We’ll frame it as “procedural failure and administrative obstruction” in the blog.)

What Offenses/Crimes Continue?

Ongoing contact attempts/third-party relays by the defendant during the one-year “no contact” window (as documented in your email to the court) and court staff’s refusal to recognize those violations as grounds to reinstate the case, instead telling you the matter was “disposed” and to file anew.

Backstory

You filed citizen complaints that ultimately reached Trenton Municipal Court.
In court, the judge placed the companion matters into mediation (over your objection), with the warning that your complaint could be dismissed if you didn’t appear.
On June 4, 2024, the court handled Case S-2022-3989 with a conditional dismissal after a guilty plea to harassment—explicitly conditioning one year of no contact, “stay out of trouble,” and payment of assessments.
In June 2025, you documented multiple violations during the active conditional period and asked the court to extend no-contact, convert to a restraining order, or reinstate for trial.
Staff repeatedly answered: “disposed,” can’t be reopened—file a new complaint.

Details about activities within the tri-state (NJ/PA/NY)

The four documents provided are limited to New Jersey (Trenton Municipal Court).
If you want this section broader, we can add PA/NY episodes after you drop those files (e.g., parallel misrouting, refusal to docket, or non-enforcement in neighboring venues).

Timeline of Events

Oct 2–3, 2023: Court schedules Zoom mediation for Oct 3 at 2:00 PM.
(Undated hearing video): Judge orders mediation; warns the complaint could be dismissed if you don’t attend; says it “usually works,” otherwise it will come back for trial.
June 4, 2024: Conditional dismissal granted in S-2022-3989 after a guilty plea, terms include one-year no contact, “no new criminal charges,” and payment of $258; administrative relist noted for June 5, 2025.
June 2–6, 2025: You email the court requesting extension/conversion and asserting documented violationsduring the conditional period. Staff replies that the case is “disposed,” can’t be reopened, advising you to file a new complaint.

Evidence Collected

Hearing/mediation transcript showing: (a) imposition of mediation over objection, (b) linkage of companion cases, and (c) warnings tied to attendance and trial posture.
Official mediation email (Zoom link, date/time) proving scheduling and the court’s own notice trail.
June 2025 email thread between me and the Trenton court staff (with DCA and prosecutor cc’d) documenting: (a) the judge’s on-record conditions in 2024, (b) your notice of violations, and (c) staff’s “disposed / file anew” position.

Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement

Judge Harold George (presiding).
Defense counsel (on Danielle Saunders’ matter).
Clerk/administrative staff: names appearing on the emails/notices include Rosaura (Rosa) Espinal, Raquel Camacho, Kimberly Finney, and Kristina M. Bryant (prosecutor referenced/cc’d).
Chalise Mapp (complainant) as a direct witness; third-party messengers I referenced (laundromat/cousin/aunt/neighbor) for the contact-by-proxy pattern.

Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp)

Ongoing emotional distress and safety concerns tied to continued contact attempts during a period that was explicitly supposed to be no-contact.
Procedural fatigue and administrative burden—being told to re-file from scratch instead of enforcing the court’s existing conditions.
Erosion of trust in court protections, as well as time and financial costs to compile, re-submit, and re-seek relief.

Current Status / Next Steps

Status (currently): Staff continued to state the case was “disposed” as of early June 2025, despite my request to reinstate/extend based on violations during the conditional period.

Next Steps:

Escalation to departments and figure heads above city level regarding the unprofessional conduct within the judicial system.

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 10/11/25 Love Bees Honey 10/11/25

About Trenton, NJ

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did They Cause?
What Laws Did/Does They Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Brief History About Trenton, NJ:
Details about activities within Trenton, New Jersey:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:

TBA October 2025

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 10/11/25 Love Bees Honey 10/11/25

Relatives

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did They Cause?
What Laws Did/Does They Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about Chalise’s relatives activities:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:

TBA October 2025

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 10/9/25 Love Bees Honey 10/9/25

Religious Abuse

It all begins with an idea.

The following information is provided for educational and public-interest purposes to document verified incidents of identity theft, financial exploitation, and related misconduct that affected my livelihood and property. All material is based on verifiable records, including emails, legal correspondence, and financial documentation. This is not addressing all religious individuals nor religious groups that displayed humanity towards me— this is referencing the abuse I’ve endured by self serving representatives of church/religious organizations that

What Offense(s) Did They Cause?
What Laws Did/Does They Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about activities within religious environments:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:

TBA October 2025

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 10/9/25 Love Bees Honey 10/9/25

Tri-State Abuse (stalking, poisoning, harassment)

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did They Cause?
What Laws Did/Does They Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about activities within the tri-state (New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York):
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:

TBA October 2025

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 10/9/25 Love Bees Honey 10/9/25

David Webb

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did He Cause?
What Laws Did/Does He Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about David Webb:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:

What Offense(s) Did He Cause?

David Webb engaged in a sustained pattern of emotional abuse, deceit, and exploitation against Chalise Monique Mapp, violating the trust built through years of intimacy and shared history. His conduct included:

Serial infidelity, including with Chalise’s half-sister Marketta Mapp and former friend Danielle Saunders—two people who later weaponized those affairs to defame and attack Chalise.
Knowingly trying to reconnect with Chalise to expose her to an incurable sexually transmitted disease.
Emotional manipulation, triangulation, and humiliation both during and after the relationship.
Exploiting Chalise’s kindness and financial stability while contributing to long-term harm to her wellbeing and safety.

What Laws Did/Does He Break?

David’s actions overlap with potential legal violations, including:

Reckless endangerment and attempt of criminal transmission of an STD through undisclosed exposure.
Defamation and malicious interference, by aiding and participating in a coordinated smear campaign led by Danielle Saunders and Marketta Mapp.
Financial exploitation and coercive control, given that Chalise paid all household expenses while David engaged in deceit and abuse.
Harassment and stalking, through ongoing monitoring and interference in her personal life after the relationship ended.

What Offenses/Crimes Continue?

David remains connected to ongoing psychological, social, and reputational harm suffered by Chalise.

He continues to enable and protect those targeting her.
False narratives originally seeded by his betrayal are still circulated online and offline.
Coordinated community interference—particularly involving Danielle Saunders and Marketta Mapp—persists, using Chalise’s private life as a tool for humiliation and deflection.

Backstory

Chalise and David met when he was in the National Guard. Their relationship began earnestly—she provided emotional and financial support, encouraged his education, and sustained their shared household. However, David’s behavior soon revealed a pattern of substance abuse, infidelity, and manipulation. Despite her loyalty, Chalise was met with betrayal, lies, and cruelty that escalated after their separation.

Details about David Webb

Former National Guard member.
Known history of arrests, drug use, and manipulative behavior.
Admitted bisexuality and substance addiction, later used as a cover for irresponsible, harmful conduct.
Repeatedly engaged in sexual relationships with women tied to Chalise’s social and family circle—suggesting a deliberate attempt to humiliate and psychologically destabilize her.
Displayed co-dependent tendencies and narcissistic behaviors, including controlling tactics, triangulation, and emotional projection.

Timeline of Events

Early 2000s: Chalise and David begin dating; he purchases an engagement ring.
2013: David incarcerated; writes letters expressing dependency and remorse.
2017: Relationship ends after multiple betrayals and emotional abuse.
2020: Friendship formally terminated following confirmation of affairs with Danielle Saunders and Marketta Mapp.
2022–2023: Chalise publishes “This Is Goodbye, David” and “David’s Letters” as evidence-based documentation to reclaim her narrative and expose the truth.
2025: Ongoing defamation, triangulated harassment, and digital monitoring linked to David’s continued involvement with her abusers.

Evidence Collected

Authentic handwritten letters from David (forensically verifiable) confirming:
- Their romantic relationship and engagement.
- His substance abuse and emotional instability.
- His dependency on Chalise for housing, finances, and emotional stability.
Screenshots, communications, and blog posts showing post-relationship harassment and public manipulation.
Facebook messages and personal testimonies establishing collaboration between David, Danielle, and Marketta.

Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement

Danielle Saunders: Former friend turned adversary who initiated an affair with David behind Chalise’s back, then entered a relationship with David following his split from Chalise; both engaged in defamation and exploitation.
Marketta Mapp: Half-sister involved in overlapping deceit and rivalry.
Community members and acquaintances who witnessed the emotional fallout and subsequent smear campaign.

Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp)

Severe emotional distress, humiliation, and reputational damage.
Physical health impacts due to stress, poisoning attempts, and potential exposure to infectious disease.
Economic losses from interference in her employment, education, and creative pursuits.
Social isolation fueled by coordinated gossip, manipulation, and betrayal.
Long-term psychological trauma stemming from intimate partner betrayal and triangulated abuse.

Current Status / Next Steps

Legal Strategy: Pursue restraining orders, identity protection, and defamation suits against all involved parties.
Media Documentation: Continue public archiving of evidence via the Justice for Chalise and Love Bees Honeyplatforms to ensure factual record preservation.
Restorative Effort: Transform this exposure into systemic accountability—ensuring that manipulation, sexual misconduct, and coordinated harassment are publicly recognized and legally addressed.

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 10/9/25 Love Bees Honey 10/9/25

Danielle Saunders

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did She Cause?
What Laws Did/Does She Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about Danielle Saunders:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:

Offense(s) Committed

Criminal Harassment & Stalking: Years of unwanted contact, triangulation through third parties, and coordinated online defamation.
Identity Theft & False Representation: Facilitating fraudulent guardianship, marriage, and insurance filings in Chalise’s name.
Cyber Harassment & Defamation: False public claims meant to damage Chalise’s reputation, character, and employment.
Employment Sabotage: Contacting Princeton University and other entities to interfere with Chalise’s career.
Medical Manipulation / Institutional Retaliation: Using her former professional ties at Capital Health (Hopewell, NJ) to influence Chalise’s July 2025 false detainment and psychiatric misdiagnosis.
Sexual Misconduct & Endangerment: Maintaining an affair with David Webb during his relationship with Chalise, later infecting him with a permanent, incurable disease; subsequently targeting other ex-partners of Chalise to replicate harm.
Conspiracy & Collusion: Working with Marketta Mapp, Mark Mapp, David Webb, and others to extend harassment and misinformation.
Psychological & Emotional Abuse: Long-term gaslighting, imitation, and coercion intended to erase Chalise’s identity and autonomy.

Laws Broken

CategoryStatuteDescriptionHarassment / StalkingN.J.S.A. 2C:33-4; 2C:12-10Repeated communications and surveillance causing fear and distress.Identity Theft / FraudN.J.S.A. 2C:21-17; 18 U.S.C. § 1028Use of another’s identity for unlawful purposes.Cyber HarassmentN.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1Online impersonation and defamation.False Swearing / Fraudulent FilingN.J.S.A. 2C:28-2Knowingly filing false or misleading statements.Insurance / Death Fraud18 U.S.C. §§ 1033–1035False claims or declarations for financial gain.Invasion of PrivacyN.J.S.A. 2A:58D-1Unauthorized surveillance or data access.Medical Negligence & Civil Rights ViolationsN.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27; 42 U.S.C. § 1983False detainment and misdiagnosis at Capital Health (2025).Defamation & Emotional DistressCommon LawIntentional infliction of psychological and reputational harm.

Continuing Offenses

Ongoing online impersonation, gossip, and disinformation.
Continued coordination with relatives and ex-partners to obstruct justice.
Possible retention or misuse of personal data and health information from prior employment.
Sustained defamation through social and professional channels.

Backstory

Danielle Saunders and Chalise Mapp met in elementary school. Over decades, the friendship evolved into jealousy and obsession. Danielle copied Chalise’s accomplishments, interfered in her relationships, and exploited professional and medical networks to cause harm.
While still friends, Danielle began an affair with David Webb. When Chalise ended the relationship, Danielle continued seeing him, later contracting a permanent disease which David admitted to Chalise he also carried. Danielle’s subsequent pursuit of Chalise’s other former partners shows calculated intent to extend risk and humiliation, not misunderstanding.
Her later access to healthcare networks culminated in the Capital Health Hopewell 2025 detainment, confirming her willingness to weaponize institutions against the victim.

Details about Danielle Saunders

Occupation: Former nurse / healthcare employee (Capital Health, Hopewell NJ)
Personality Profile: Manipulative, highly competitive, image-driven, uses access to authority to control or punish others.
Known Associates: Marketta Mapp, Mark Mapp, David Webb, Marcus Toro, Marlon Webb, Jennifer Webb, Shalana Crudup.

Timeline of Events

YearEventRelevance1990s–2000sEarly friendship; imitation behavior begins.Establishes motive pattern.2009–2010Affair begins with David Webb while he’s dating Chalise.Initial betrayal.2011“Oprah” (Sumatra Stro) interacts with Chalise’s posts; triangulation evident.Third-party corroboration.2014–2017Danielle deepens relationship with David Webb; engages in smearing and likely surveillance.Escalation.2017David publicly references Danielle in coded posts.Confirms ongoing affair.2020Online defamation and career sabotage increase.Professional harm.Mar 2021Final severing of friendship.Trigger for retaliation.Mar 24 2022“Danielle ‘Daniel’ Saunders: The Copycat” published.Public exposé.Mar 29 2022“Relatives, Ex-Friends…” published; includes Oprah connection.Expanded record.Jun 28 2022Danielle’s cousin Dominique Osei acknowledges article.Independent corroboration.Feb 2024Chalise’s STD lab results – all negative (Adobe Scan attached).Confirms health status.Jul 22 2025Capital Health Hopewell detainment / false schizophrenia diagnosis.Institutional retaliation tied to Danielle’s prior employment.2023–2025Continuing online and offline harassment.Current phase.

Evidence Collected

ExhibitDescriptionEvidentiary ValueA“Danielle ‘Daniel’ Saunders: The Copycat”(3/24/22)Primary record of abuse and identity theft.BFacebook Message – Dominique Osei (6/28/22)Confirms public awareness and truthfulness.C“Relatives, Ex-Friends…” (3/29/22)Extends pattern to other conspirators.DFacebook Post + Sumatra Stro Comment (2011)Third-party triangulation proof.ECapital Health Hopewell Detainment Record (7/22/25)Demonstrates institutional retaliation.FEmployment Interference at Princeton UniversityShows professional sabotage.GPlanned Parenthood Lab Results (Feb 2024)Confirms Chalise’s negative STD status; disproves rumors.HScreenshots / logs / messagesOngoing harassment and impersonation evidence.

Witnesses / Third-Party Involvement

Dominique Liandra Osei – Danielle’s cousin; corroborated articles.
Sumatra Stro (“Oprah”) – Commented on relationship posts; validates awareness.
Marketta Mapp – Half-sister / collaborator.
Mark Mapp – Father / enabler.
David Webb – Ex-partner / participant in affair and disease transmission.
Marcus Toro – Ex-partner / assisted in slander campaign.
Marlon & Jennifer Webb – Shielded David and facilitated misconduct.
Capital Health Personnel (Hopewell) – Involved in false detainment and diagnosis.

Impact on Victim (Chalise Monique Mapp)

Physical Health: Potential exposure to incurable infection avoided only by early separation; later verified negative lab results.
Psychological: Severe trauma from betrayal, stalking, and false psychiatric detainment.
Professional: Job loss / blacklisting after defamation.
Financial: Medical and legal expenses from false diagnosis and identity theft.
Reputational: Persistent smear campaign damaging public standing.
Civil Rights: Loss of liberty through medical misuse and government complicity.

Current Status / Next Steps

Permanent Restraining Order – to bar further contact and impersonation.
Formal Complaints – to NJ Board of Nursing and Department of Health re: Danielle Saunders and Capital Health misconduct.
HIPAA / Record Corrections – remove false schizophrenia diagnosis.
Civil and Criminal Actions – for harassment, identity theft, defamation, and medical fraud.
Federal and State Oversight Filings – HHS OCR and DOJ Civil Rights Division.
Media Documentation – integration into Organized Assault Behind Danielle Saunders and the System That Enabled Her and JusticeforChalise.com.
International Advocacy – submission to human-rights and medical-ethics bodies if domestic remedies fail.

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 10/9/25 Love Bees Honey 10/9/25

Marketta Mapp

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did She Cause?
What Laws Did/Does She Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about Marketta Mapp:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:

What Offense(s) Did She Cause?

Marketta Mapp engaged in multiple offenses against me that span property destruction, theft, fraud, and defamation. She collaborated with others—including my ex-fiancé David Webb and Danielle Saunders—to invade my home, steal personal property, impersonate me, and disseminate harmful lies about my health and character.

Her actions caused both material and emotional harm, including the theft of family heirlooms, the use of my identity to access or benefit from financial and insurance accounts, the hacking of personal devices and Wi-Fi networks, and a sustained campaign of public humiliation through false claims (that I was dead, homeless, diseased, or engaged in sex work).

What Laws Did/Does She Break?

Evidence and public records confirm that Marketta has repeatedly violated New Jersey’s criminal statutes, including:

2C:17-3A(1) – Criminal Mischief (damaging private property)
2C:33-4C – Harassment and Alarming Conduct
2C:20-3A – Theft by Unlawful Taking / Disposition of Movable Property
2C:20-7A – Receiving Stolen Property
2C:29-3B(4) – Hindering Apprehension by Providing False Information

Her record also reveals repeat offenses for theft and criminal mischief, showing that these behaviors are not isolated incidents but part of a larger, persistent pattern.

What Offenses/Crimes Continue?

The ongoing crimes involve:

Continued dissemination of defamatory statements and false information.
Identity misuse, including the possibility of false insurance or guardianship claims filed under my name.
Online harassment and coordinated attacks via social media with associates of Danielle Saunders.
Theft and imitation of intellectual property, including adaptation of my original brand concept “Mapp It Out” into her own business “On the Mapp Logistics.”
Involvement in fraudulent financial activity connected to my accounts and reputation.

Backstory

Marketta is my half-sister. For years, I treated her with generosity and kindness, even during her personal and financial struggles. That trust was weaponized. Around 2014, she began borrowing money and displaying manipulative behavior. When I declined to lend further assistance, she retaliated through lies, property damage, and theft.

According to testimony from David Webb, she broke into my home using my passcode, accessed private data, and stole personal items—including a bracelet belonging to our late grandmother. Physical evidence of tampering (door and window damage, fingerprints) was recorded and inspected by police.

Over time, Marketta aligned herself with individuals already known to have caused harm, further spreading slander and conspiring to financially and socially destroy me.

Details about Marketta Mapp

Criminal Record Summary:
- 1996–2024: Multiple municipal complaints including theft, criminal mischief, hindering apprehension, and receiving stolen property.
- 2023 Case S-3578: Receiving stolen property under $200.
- 2017 Case S-3704: Criminal mischief (property damage).
- 2016 Case W-3996: Hindering apprehension—providing false information.
- Numerous warrants and court transfers to prosecutorial review.

Her mother, Wanda Tift, also has a criminal history involving theft by deception and receiving stolen property—indicating a multigenerational pattern of deceitful conduct.

Timeline of Events

2014: Marketta requests money; when denied, begins spreading rumors and damaging property.
2015–2017: Collaborates with Danielle Saunders and David Webb; confirmed break-in attempt, tampered locks, and visible fingerprints on my property.
2018–2020: Posts defamatory lies online, including claims that I am deceased or diseased.
2021–2023: Expands defamation on social media, while simultaneously launching “On the Mapp Logistics,” copying my “Mapp It Out” branding.
2024: Recorded as defendant in municipal case S-2023-3578 for receiving stolen property; prior incidents of criminal mischief confirmed.
Present (2025): Continues to evade accountability while profiting off stolen likeness, identity, and reputation.

Evidence Collected

Photographs of door and car damage, rose bushes trampled, and trash placed on my property.
Screenshots and social media posts documenting defamation and tagging intended to provoke or ridicule me.
Police reports and court documentation from case numbers 1111 S 2022 003990, S 2017 3704, and S 2023 3578.
Comparison photos proving theft of heirloom bracelet.
Medical records disproving false claims about disease and drug use.
Recordings, screenshots, and written testimony from witnesses including David Webb confirming Marketta’s break-in and hacking activities.

Witnesses / Third-Party Involvement

David Webb – Ex-fiancé; confessed to aiding Marketta in breaking into my home and accessing private accounts.
Neighbors – Observed disturbances and vehicle vandalism near my property.
Police – Responded to reports and inspected fingerprint evidence.
Social media users – Tagged and interacted with Marketta’s defamatory posts.

Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp)

Marketta’s actions deeply affected every aspect of my life—my safety, livelihood, emotional health, and public reputation. She:

Contributed to social isolation by spreading lies throughout the Trenton community.
Caused property loss, financial strain, and emotional distress.
Conspired with others to invade my privacy and erode public trust in my character.
Exploited family ties and public sympathy for her own benefit while leaving lasting reputational scars.

Current Status / Next Steps

Requesting a judicial review of her past criminal record to demonstrate a continued pattern of malicious behavior.
Including this case within the larger Absolute Justice for Chalise Mapp campaign to ensure the court system cannot dismiss the consistent and documented harm caused by Marketta Mapp and her collaborators.

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 10/7/25 Love Bees Honey 10/7/25

Mark Mapp

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did He Cause?

Mark Mapp caused both financial and reputational harm.
Beyond defaulting on the vehicle loan he convinced Chalise M. Mapp to co-sign, he used guilt, lies, and emotional manipulation to distort facts and persuade relatives to vilify her.
His behavior prompted family members to passively or openly slander her name while shielding his own wrongdoing.
If not for preserved video and credit documentation, these falsehoods would have been harder to disprove.
He also ignored the repayment agreement, allowing the account to charge off at $8,623, severely damaging her credit and financial standing.

What Laws Did/Does He Break?

(Citations: NJ Stat. §§ 12A:2-101 et seq., 2C:21-4, 2C:21-7, 2C:21-17; 18 U.S.C. § 1028A; NJ Common Law Defamation; Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46)

Breach of Contract (NJ Stat. § 12A:2-101 et seq.) – Failed to honor the repayment agreement on a co-signed vehicle loan, creating direct financial loss.
Fraudulent Misrepresentation (NJ Stat. §§ 2C:21-4 & 2C:21-7) – Misled Chalise about the loan and his DUI restrictions to obtain her financial backing.
Credit Fraud / Identity-Related Harm (18 U.S.C. § 1028A; NJ Stat. § 2C:21-17) – Used her creditworthiness, then allowed delinquency to ruin it.
Defamation and False Light (NJ Stat. § 2A:15-5.1 & Common Law) – Encouraged or permitted false statements that damaged her reputation.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (Restatement § 46) – Gaslighting and family-wide guilt tactics intended to cause psychological harm.

What Offenses/Crimes Continue?

Ongoing credit damage from the charged-off account.
Continued spread of misleading family narratives that question the victim’s integrity.
Emotional and social isolation caused by sustained manipulation and slander.

Backstory

In 2013, Mark Mapp persuaded Chalise Mapp to co-sign a vehicle loan, assuring her he would handle all payments.
Within a year he stopped paying and refused to return the car, claiming she was “not on the contract.”
When confronted, he relied on guilt and deflection—asking how he would get to work—while denying responsibility.
He later received a DUI, confirmed by the Dräger Interlock device required to start the car.

Details about Mark Mapp

His pattern reflects long-term manipulation and avoidance: denial, guilt-tripping, and dependence on women to sustain him.
He weaponizes familial sympathy and portrays himself as the victim to escape accountability, a behavior echoed in how certain relatives (Marketta Mapp and Mark Mapp Jr.) publicly defend him online despite verified evidence of wrongdoing.

Timeline of Events

Aug 31 2013 – Vehicle loan opened (Harris Automotive Group LLC).
Nov 1 2014 – First delinquency recorded.
Dec 1 2014 – Last payment made.
Mar 1 2015 – Delinquency first reported to credit bureaus.
Oct 4 2018 – $8,623 charged off under joint liability (Equifax report).
Apr 10 2020 & May 15 2015 – Facebook and Instagram posts by Mark Jr. and Marketta defending Mark Mapp Sr. and attempting to guilt Chalise.
2025 – Evidence confirms ongoing collaboration between Mark Mapp, Marketta Mapp, and Danielle Saunders. During this period, Mark continued his long-standing pattern of aligning himself with women who finance or nurture his needs, using emotional dependency as leverage. When confronted by Chalise M. Mapp about the conflict involving her half-sister, he escalated the situation through manipulation and deceit, later staging and falsely alleging that he had been stabbed by her. This accusation represents an ongoing established pattern of retaliatory lying and deflection whenever held accountable.

Evidence Collected

Transcript: Takes Car from Mark Mapp for Non-Payment (PDF) – verbal admission and gaslighting.
Photo: Dräger Interlock breathalyzer – proves DUI restriction.
Credit Report Excerpt: $8,623 charge-off with Harris Automotive Group LLC.
Facebook Post: Mark Mapp Jr., Apr 10 2020 – public pressure for forgiveness.
Instagram Post: Marketta Mapp, May 15 2015 – loyalty to Mark Sr. and Jr.
Photograph: Mark Mapp with Danielle Saunders and Marketta Mapp – continued association.

Witnesses / Third-Party Involvement

Harris Automotive Group LLC (creditor of record).
Relatives (Marketta Mapp, Mark Mapp Jr.) who publicly endorsed and reinforced his false narratives.

Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp)

Long-term credit damage and reduced access to fair lending.
Emotional pain from betrayal and family-based slander.
Long-term money stress that threw other parts of life off balance and made recovery harder.

Current Status / Next Steps

Case is still pending, but in the meantime preserve, present and archive all credit, transcript, and media evidence.

Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer

JUST THE FACTS!

Love Bees Honey 5/28/19 Love Bees Honey 5/28/19

Danny Crudup

It all begins with an idea.

What Offense(s) Did He Cause?
What Laws Did/Does He Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about Danny Crudup:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:
<<See Images Below>>

What Offense(s) Did He Cause?

Danny Crudup created a fraudulent Gmail account using my name — chalisemapp321@gmail.com — and used it to communicate with the New Jersey Lottery as if he were me. He submitted paperwork under my identity to claim a Collect ’N Win Top Prize.
He later contacted me from his verified Yahoo account, acknowledged the submission, and attempted to pressure me into signing documents to finalize the claim.

In addition to the identity theft, Mr. Crudup previously placed utility bills, taxes, and property accounts in my deceased mother’s name after her passing, damaging her credit and leaving debts that I later had to repay.

What Laws Did/Does He Break?

Identity Theft – N.J. Stat. § 2C:21-17 (using another person’s personal identifying information without consent to obtain a benefit).
Theft by Deception – N.J. Stat. § 2C:20-4 (obtaining property or funds through misrepresentation).
Federal Statute 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (fraud and related activity involving identification documents or interstate impersonation).

What Offenses/Crimes Continue?

Ongoing misuse of family property and financial resources remains unresolved. Records indicate that my late grandmother’s estate were withheld and not divided among rightful heirs. My mother’s death means anything bequeath to her goes to her children. There has been no release of any funds or benefits allocated to me and my brothers.

Backstory

After my mother’s death, my brothers and I moved in with our grandmother. Danny later moved his household into my mother’s former home — a property she earned through a low-income housing program. The home later entered foreclosure after Danny Crudup neglected required payments and intentionally withheld that information from me. Upon discovering the truth, I personally paid off the debts (city taxes, utilities, and maintenance) using my personal funds that I had earned and saved for college.

In late 2020, Danny Crudup unexpectedly text messaged me offering a “gift” — a free wine bottle from his workplace under $50 using a coupon code. This was highly unusual, as he had never given me gifts or gestures of that kind. After I redeemed it, he sent me messages instructing to sign off on a New Jersey Lottery ticket claim and to provide my Social Security Number. He attempted to justify this by referencing an old $500 expense from 2017 that was not even owed to him, but to his employer who had hired me for site and creative design work — a debt I already repaid in full through completed services. The disingenuous “gift” and false claim was a means to establish leverage or a sense of obligation before pressuring me to authorize the fraudulent lottery claim.

At that time, I had been employed in a well-paying position for over three years and had, on multiple occasions, treated Danny to gifts and family outings at my own expense. This further disproves his debt claim and raises concern about his intent to exploit a monetary event that did not belong to him. After confronting Danny Crudup and ending all communication, he continued spreading false narratives about me and aligning himself with others who have engaged in similar misconduct.

Details about Danny Crudup

Relation: Maternal uncle
Known Email Addresses: dcrudup127@yahoo.com, fraudulent alias chalisemapp321@gmail.com
Location: Trenton, New Jersey area
Relevant Document: “Danny Crudup – NJ Lottery Collect ’N Win Email Chain (Dec 2020)”

Timeline of Events

December 16, 2020 – New Jersey Lottery email congratulates “Chalise Mapp” at the fake Gmail address.
December 28, 2020 – Danny forwards the winning email from his Yahoo account to me, requesting I fill out paperwork and pay him.
December 30, 2020 – I reply from my verified Outlook address, identifying the act as identity theft and demanding deletion of the fake account.
Post-2020 – New Jersey Lottery awards me the earnings in 2021. No restitution, corrective action, or acknowledgment of wrongdoing has been made by Danny Crudup since acknowledging his wrongdoings. After ceasing communication with him, Danny continued spreading false narratives about me and aligning himself with others who committed similar offenses.

Evidence Collected

Original Outlook email chain showing the fake Gmail account in use.
Screenshots and PDF printouts of communications from both email accounts.
Utility and property records confirming prior misuse of my mother’s name.
Personal records showing payment of delinquent balances and foreclosure prevention.

Witnesses / Third-Party Involvement

New Jersey Lottery staff (sender: Kalliopi A. Kostis, NJ Lottery) who communicated with the fraudulent Gmail account.
Other relatives aware of the property and inheritance disputes.
Financial and legal contacts who assisted with debt repayment and housing preservation.

Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp)

Loss of personal privacy and control over identifying information.
Financial burden from repaying debts not incurred by me.
Potential risk to educational and housing eligibility due to identity misuse.
Continued uncertainty regarding withheld family estate proceeds.

Current Status / Next Steps

Documented as Exhibit A in my ongoing identity-theft and inheritance-related filings.
Formal requests for investigation and restitution are being prepared for appropriate state and federal authorities.
Evidence preserved for submission to journalists, investigators, and legal representatives as part of the Justice 4 Chalise documentation archive.

Click photo below or here to see string emails and communication regarding this matter further.