David Webb
The following information is provided for educational and public-interest purposes to document verified incidents of identity theft, financial exploitation, and related misconduct that affected my livelihood and property. All material is based on verifiable records, including emails, legal correspondence, and financial documentation.
What Offense(s) Did He Cause?
What Laws Did/Does He Break?
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
Backstory:
Details about David Webb:
Timeline of Events:
Evidence Collected:
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement:
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp):
Current Status / Next Steps:
What Offense(s) Did He Cause?
David Webb engaged in a sustained pattern of emotional abuse, deceit, and exploitation against Chalise Monique Mapp, violating the trust built through years of intimacy and shared history. His conduct included:
Serial infidelity, including with Chalise’s half-sister Marketta Mapp and former friend Danielle Saunders—two people who later weaponized those affairs to defame and attack Chalise.
Knowingly trying to reconnect with Chalise to expose her to an incurable sexually transmitted disease.
Emotional manipulation, triangulation, and humiliation both during and after the relationship.
Exploiting Chalise’s kindness and financial stability while contributing to long-term harm to her wellbeing and safety.
What Laws Did/Does He Break?
David’s actions overlap with potential legal violations, including:
Reckless endangerment and attempt of criminal transmission of an STD through undisclosed exposure.
Defamation and malicious interference, by aiding and participating in a coordinated smear campaign led by Danielle Saunders and Marketta Mapp.
Financial exploitation and coercive control, given that Chalise paid all household expenses while David engaged in deceit and abuse.
Harassment and stalking, through ongoing monitoring and interference in her personal life after the relationship ended.
What Offenses/Crimes Continue?
David remains connected to ongoing psychological, social, and reputational harm suffered by Chalise.
He continues to enable and protect those targeting her.
False narratives originally seeded by his betrayal are still circulated online and offline.
Coordinated community interference—particularly involving Danielle Saunders and Marketta Mapp—persists, using Chalise’s private life as a tool for humiliation and deflection.
Backstory
Chalise and David met when he was in the National Guard. Their relationship began earnestly—she provided emotional and financial support, encouraged his education, and sustained their shared household. However, David’s behavior soon revealed a pattern of substance abuse, infidelity, and manipulation. Despite her loyalty, Chalise was met with betrayal, lies, and cruelty that escalated after their separation.
Details about David Webb
Former National Guard member.
Known history of arrests, drug use, and manipulative behavior.
Admitted bisexuality and substance addiction, later used as a cover for irresponsible, harmful conduct.
Repeatedly engaged in sexual relationships with women tied to Chalise’s social and family circle—suggesting a deliberate attempt to humiliate and psychologically destabilize her.
Displayed co-dependent tendencies and narcissistic behaviors, including controlling tactics, triangulation, and emotional projection.
Timeline of Events
Early 2000s: Chalise and David begin dating; he purchases an engagement ring.
2013: David incarcerated; writes letters expressing dependency and remorse.
2017: Relationship ends after multiple betrayals and emotional abuse.
2020: Friendship formally terminated following confirmation of affairs with Danielle Saunders and Marketta Mapp.
2022–2023: Chalise publishes “This Is Goodbye, David” and “David’s Letters” as evidence-based documentation to reclaim her narrative and expose the truth.
2025: Ongoing defamation, triangulated harassment, and digital monitoring linked to David’s continued involvement with her abusers.
Evidence Collected
Authentic handwritten letters from David (forensically verifiable) confirming:
Their romantic relationship and engagement.
His substance abuse and emotional instability.
His dependency on Chalise for housing, finances, and emotional stability.
Screenshots, communications, and blog posts showing post-relationship harassment and public manipulation.
Facebook messages and personal testimonies establishing collaboration between David, Danielle, and Marketta.
Witnesses/Third-Party Involvement
Danielle Saunders: Former friend turned adversary who initiated an affair with David behind Chalise’s back, then entered a relationship with David following his split from Chalise; both engaged in defamation and exploitation.
Marketta Mapp: Half-sister involved in overlapping deceit and rivalry.
Community members and acquaintances who witnessed the emotional fallout and subsequent smear campaign.
Impact on Victim (Chalise Mapp)
Severe emotional distress, humiliation, and reputational damage.
Physical health impacts due to stress, poisoning attempts, and potential exposure to infectious disease.
Economic losses from interference in her employment, education, and creative pursuits.
Social isolation fueled by coordinated gossip, manipulation, and betrayal.
Long-term psychological trauma stemming from intimate partner betrayal and triangulated abuse.
Current Status / Next Steps
Legal Strategy: Pursue restraining orders, identity protection, and defamation suits against all involved parties.
Media Documentation: Continue public archiving of evidence via the Justice for Chalise and Love Bees Honeyplatforms to ensure factual record preservation.
Restorative Effort: Transform this exposure into systemic accountability—ensuring that manipulation, sexual misconduct, and coordinated harassment are publicly recognized and legally addressed.
Public Record & Evidence Disclaimer
The following material is presented for educational, journalistic, and evidentiary purposes only. All names, email addresses, and communications shown appear solely to verify incidents of identity theft, fraud, and related misconduct. This publication does not encourage contact, harassment, or retaliation toward any person named.
Information is reproduced from existing records, emails, and correspondence that form part of ongoing documentation submitted to legal and investigative authorities. Statements are based on verifiable evidence and are made in good-faith reporting to protect the public and defend my livelihood. Personal addresses, phone numbers, or unrelated private details have been redacted where possible to preserve privacy.